Código de Práctica utilizado por la revista

PRACTICE CODE

This form is for the exclusive use of referees of journals published by the Faculty of Educational Sciences of the University of the Enterprise.

 

Article type *

Choose an option

Review
Essay

Belonging, originality, and contribution *

Choose a score from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest)

2 - Limited relevance
3 - Moderate contribution
4 - Relevant contribution
5 - Innovative contribution

Clarity of purpose / goals / thesis *

Choose a score from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest)

2 - Unclear purpose
3 - General purpose
4 - Clear purpose
5 - Clear goals

Theoretical justification and review *

Choose a score from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest)

2 - Insufficient bibliography
3 - Proper review
4 - Solid review
5 - Exhaustive review

Methodology / argumentative coherence *

Choose a score from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest)

2 - Weak methodology
3 - Sufficient methodology
4 - Appropriate methodology
5 - Rigorous methodology

Analysis development / results *

Choose a score from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest)

2 - Incomplete analysis
3 - Understandable analysis
4 - Consistent analysis
5 - In-depth analysis

Academic discussion *

Choose a score from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest)

2 - Weak discussion
3 - General discussion
4 - Appropriate discussion
5 - Critical discussion

Conclusions and implications *

Choose a score from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest)

2 - Confusing conclusions
3 - General conclusions
4 - Correct conclusions
5 - Solid conclusions

Writing and structure *

Choose a score from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest)

2 - Common mistakes
3 - Acceptable writing
4 - Good writing
5 - Impeccable writing

Editorial standards and ethics *

Choose a score from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest)

2 - Citation problems
3 - Partial compliance with standards
4 - It meets almost all standards
5 - Full compliance with regulations